Curiosa: O RLY?
Nov. 30th, 2007 06:26 pmMy nominee for world's most misleading advertising slogan, seen in the children's department of Borders:
Uh-huh. You just go on thinking that ...Books are safe gifts
for kids.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 12:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 06:25 am (UTC)*feels the need to defend her corporate employer*
I think that might have been a sign someone printed up in-store, and those can be notoriously... interesting. Corporate ofice has generally been good about signage, nothing too ridiculous, but bear in mind that a lot of the merchandise managers and supervisors didn't graduate with English majors, and at least that one gets props for not misspelling anything. (We had a heinously huge display with 'espresso' misspelled as 'expresso'. Urgh.)
I suspect the point there is to say, "Hey, here's a good gift that won't be recalled because the paper has an accidental neurotoxin in it!" Or somesuch nonsense like that.
I personally can't wait for The Golden Compass to be on the big screen and the whole His Dark Materials controversy to flare up again. There's nothing quite like subversive childrens' literature to get the blood pumping, eh?
no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-01 11:51 pm (UTC)Oh, I'm pretty sure that's all that's meant. On the other hand, I don't rule out the possibility of deliberate irony on the part of the local staff, whatever corporate HQ and middle marketing management thought they were intending to convey. :-)
I personally can't wait for The Golden Compass to be on the big screen and the whole His Dark Materials controversy to flare up again. There's nothing quite like subversive childrens' literature to get the blood pumping, eh?
It's about time Pullman got his due as the Real Subversive among the theists who care about such things. Maybe they'll leave Rowling alone once they see something truly dedicated to knocking the props out from under their worldview. (Mind you, I don't think it's altogether successful; by the third book I was rolling my eyes at his metaphysics and wishing he'd tone the polemic down to something below deafening. Pratchett's just as subversive, but hugely less shrill.)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-02 06:26 pm (UTC)